Debate x NZIFF #11: Lurker

DEBATE X NZIFF | REVIEW | WEB EXCLUSIVE

Written by Joshua Black (he/him) | Contributing Writer

I remember once learning that the audience will always have empathy for the protagonist, as they can only see the world as that protagonist sees it. While I always assumed that to be true, Lurker proved to be a film that will give you that empathy, only to slowly pry it away from you.

Matthew, the protagonist, finds himself suddenly - almost prophetically - close to rising star Oliver. Their relationship drives the remainder of the story as a constant push and pull of influence. The relationship is layered with subtle details, to the point where it can feel uncomfortably realistic. A simple two second reaction shot gives the same embarrassment and stress as when the cool group in high school didn’t laugh at your joke.

Matthew’s character seems inspired by Nightcrawler. Not just because both protagonists have a shitty camera, but because of their devotion and skill in weaponising said camera. Both films offer analysis of the inhuman hunger required to stay important in the media industry - this is best summarised by Matthew when he says "We all want the same thing, I just want it more."

Lurker is about paranoia with fame, it is about alienation with fame, and it is about the reflex to exploit fame. Neither Oliver nor Matthew are good people, and this will leave you with a lot to reflect on. Lurker will fight with your heart on who you should care about, and while there is a clear winner by the end, you’ll be sure to cringe in your seat as this battle unfolds.